microscopy image analysis software Search Results


97
Gatan Inc digital micrograph
Digital Micrograph, supplied by Gatan Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc00165693-58-21-23?v=Gatan+Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
digital micrograph - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Gatan Inc orientation imaging microscopy oim software
Orientation Imaging Microscopy Oim Software, supplied by Gatan Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/10__3390_slash_met10010136-99-0-5?v=Gatan+Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
orientation imaging microscopy oim software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MetaMorph Inc microscopy automation & image analysis software
Microscopy Automation & Image Analysis Software, supplied by MetaMorph Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc08203899-29-1-0?v=MetaMorph+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microscopy automation & image analysis software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MetaMorph Inc metamorph® microscopy automation & image analysis software
Metamorph® Microscopy Automation & Image Analysis Software, supplied by MetaMorph Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pm36379916-144-13-12?v=MetaMorph+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
metamorph® microscopy automation & image analysis software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Empix Imaging epifluorescence microscopy northern eclipse 6.0 software
Epifluorescence Microscopy Northern Eclipse 6.0 Software, supplied by Empix Imaging, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc03316602-70-21-28?v=Empix+Imaging
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epifluorescence microscopy northern eclipse 6.0 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
3i - Intelligent Imaging digital microscopy imaging software (slidebook version 5.0
Digital Microscopy Imaging Software (Slidebook Version 5.0, supplied by 3i - Intelligent Imaging, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pm31396401-246-7-14?v=3i+-+Intelligent+Imaging
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
digital microscopy imaging software (slidebook version 5.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
3i - Intelligent Imaging 3i slidebook sb 4.2.0.11 software
3i Slidebook Sb 4.2.0.11 Software, supplied by 3i - Intelligent Imaging, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc02921551-85-17-22?v=3i+-+Intelligent+Imaging
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3i slidebook sb 4.2.0.11 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
TexSEM Laboratories orientation imaging micrograph
Orientation Imaging Micrograph, supplied by TexSEM Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/10__1017_slash_s1551929500062179-67-1-16?v=TexSEM+Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
orientation imaging micrograph - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SourceForge net phobia laser scanning microscopy imaging processor (phlip) software
Phobia Laser Scanning Microscopy Imaging Processor (Phlip) Software, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc06999451-113-17-26?v=SourceForge+net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phobia laser scanning microscopy imaging processor (phlip) software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc 3d x-ray microscopy data analysis
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
3d X Ray Microscopy Data Analysis, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc10875706-173-0-7?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d x-ray microscopy data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
NT MDT America Inc scanning probe microscopy data analysis software nova
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
Scanning Probe Microscopy Data Analysis Software Nova, supplied by NT MDT America Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/10__1364_slash_ome__6__002128-178-34-41?v=NT+MDT+America+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scanning probe microscopy data analysis software nova - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Kinetic Imaging Ltd time-lapse microscopy tempus software
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
Time Lapse Microscopy Tempus Software, supplied by Kinetic Imaging Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/pmc02230659-300-15-17?v=Kinetic+Imaging+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
time-lapse microscopy tempus software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. 3D X-ray microscopy images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

Journal: Hearing research

Article Title: Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response

doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108597

Figure Lengend Snippet: Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. 3D X-ray microscopy images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

Article Snippet: 3D X-ray microscopy data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism software (Graph-Pad Software, USA) via ordinary one-way ANOVA.

Techniques: Microscopy, In Situ, Standard Deviation